7 October 2025
/ current concerns 2-016
[This article
may be freely published provide the credit/authorship is retained. We’ll
appreciate receiving a reference/link to the publication]
WHEN HEALTH
PROMOTION STAGNATES OR DECLINES: THE CASE FOR CONTINUOUS STRENGTHENING OF HEALTH
PROMOTION SYSTEMS
-
by Dr.
Uzodinma Adirieje,
FAHOA
+2348034725905
(WhatsApp) / EMAIL: druzoadirieje2015@gmail.com
CEO/Programmes Director, Afrihealth Optonet Association
(AHOA) – CSOs Network and Think-tank
follow Dr. Uzodinma Adirieje on
Facebook by clicking on this link <https://www.facebook.com/uzoadirieje>
to receive more posts.
'Like' and comment on my posts to receive
other people's responses.
INTRODUCTION
Health promotion—the science and art of enabling people to increase
control over their health—has been widely acknowledged as a cornerstone of
modern public health. It goes beyond curative care to emphasize prevention,
empowerment, and supportive environments. However, despite global recognition
of its importance, health promotion efforts often stagnate or even decline in
certain contexts. This reality poses significant risks to societies struggling
with growing burdens of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), infectious outbreaks,
climate-related health impacts, and systemic health inequities. Understanding
the reasons for such stagnation, its consequences, and strategies for
revitalization is therefore critical for health systems and communities.
WHY DOES HEALTH PROMOTION STAGNATE OR DECLINE?
1. Weak Policy Commitment
Health promotion requires political will, intersectoral
collaboration, and long-term investment. In many countries, particularly in
low- and middle-income settings, governments prioritize curative health
services that deliver visible, short-term results over preventive strategies
whose benefits are less immediate. This imbalance sidelines health promotion
programs and reduces their sustainability.
2. Inadequate Funding and Resource Constraints
A major driver of stagnation is chronic underfunding. Health
promotion is often seen as a “soft” investment compared to the more tangible
infrastructure of hospitals, drugs, and equipment. Limited budgets result in
insufficient training of health educators, weak communication campaigns, and
inadequate community outreach. Over time, this lack of investment erodes
momentum and diminishes impact.
3. Fragmented Implementation and Institutional Weakness
Even when policies exist, poor coordination among ministries,
agencies, and community stakeholders hinders effectiveness. For example,
promoting healthy diets requires collaboration between health, agriculture,
education, and trade sectors—yet siloed approaches lead to duplication,
confusion, or outright neglect. Similarly, weak governance structures,
corruption, or poor monitoring systems can stall progress.
4. Competing Health Priorities and Emergencies
During health crises such as pandemics or humanitarian emergencies,
resources and attention are often diverted away from long-term health
promotion. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic shifted focus toward testing,
treatment, and vaccination, leaving preventive and educational campaigns
underfunded and disrupted. In fragile health systems, such diversions can
permanently derail ongoing health promotion initiatives.
5. Cultural and Social Resistance
Health promotion often requires behavior change, which can encounter
resistance from entrenched social norms, cultural practices, or economic
realities. When communities perceive health messages as incompatible with their
way of life—or when interventions fail to be culturally sensitive—programs lose
credibility and effectiveness, leading to disillusionment and eventual decline.
6. Commercial and Structural Determinants of Health
The global influence of industries producing tobacco, alcohol,
sugary beverages, and processed foods undermines health promotion. Aggressive
marketing campaigns often counteract health messages, especially in vulnerable
populations. Without strong regulatory frameworks, commercial interests
overpower health education and erode public trust in health promotion
campaigns.
CONSEQUENCES OF STAGNATION OR DECLINE
When health promotion efforts stagnate or decline, societies
experience both immediate and long-term consequences.
a. Increased Burden of Preventable Diseases: Without sustained campaigns on vaccination, nutrition, hygiene, and
lifestyle choices, preventable diseases rise, straining health systems and
increasing mortality.
b. Exacerbation of Inequalities:
Vulnerable populations—such as rural communities, low-income households, and
marginalized groups—lose access to the knowledge and resources needed to
protect their health, widening social and economic inequities.
c. Reduced Community Engagement and Trust: Health promotion thrives on participation and empowerment. When
programs fade, communities may feel neglected, leading to distrust in health
systems and poor uptake of future initiatives.
d. Economic Costs: Preventable diseases
increase healthcare expenditure, reduce workforce productivity, and constrain
national development. The cost of inaction in health promotion often surpasses
the investment required to sustain it.
REVITALIZING HEALTH PROMOTION
The decline or stagnation of health promotion is not inevitable.
Several strategies can re-energize efforts:
1. Strengthening Political and Policy Commitment
Governments must elevate health promotion within national health
agendas, framing it as a critical investment in sustainable development.
Policies should integrate health promotion across sectors such as education,
transport, agriculture, and urban planning. Legislative measures, such as
tobacco control laws or sugar taxes, can reinforce healthier environments.
2. Sustainable Financing
Dedicated funding streams—whether from government budgets,
international aid, or innovative financing mechanisms—are crucial. Embedding
health promotion into universal health coverage (UHC) packages ensures it is
not sidelined during resource allocation.
3. Building Strong Institutions and Partnerships
Robust health promotion requires cross-sectoral collaboration and
multi-level governance. Partnerships between government, civil society,
academia, and the private sector can mobilize resources, amplify reach, and
enhance accountability. Empowering local governments and communities ensures
interventions are context-specific and sustainable.
4. Harnessing Technology and Media
Digital tools and social media platforms provide cost-effective
avenues for health education and behavior change campaigns. Mobile health
(mHealth) applications can support chronic disease management, vaccination
reminders, and lifestyle interventions, especially in younger, tech-savvy
populations.
5. Community Participation and Empowerment
Sustainable health promotion cannot be imposed; it must be
co-created with communities. Culturally appropriate approaches that respect
local practices, values, and beliefs foster ownership and increase uptake.
Training community health workers, peer educators, and local leaders
strengthens trust and ensures continuity.
6. Regulating Harmful Commercial Practices
Governments should implement policies to reduce the influence of
industries that promote unhealthy products. Bans on misleading advertising,
plain packaging for tobacco, and taxation of sugary beverages are proven tools.
Aligning health promotion with the broader agenda of addressing social
determinants of health strengthens resilience against corporate interference.
CONCLUSION
Health promotion is a linchpin for building healthier societies,
preventing disease, and achieving equity in health outcomes. Yet, when it
stagnates or declines, the ripple effects are profound—ranging from rising
disease burdens to weakened community trust. The reasons for stagnation are
complex, spanning political, financial, institutional, social, and commercial
domains. However, revitalization is possible through strong policy commitment,
sustainable funding, cross-sectoral collaboration, community empowerment, and
regulation of harmful commercial influences. Ultimately, societies cannot
afford to neglect health promotion. As the global community faces interlinked
challenges of NCDs, pandemics, climate change, and inequality, health promotion
must remain dynamic, resilient, and central to public health practice. Its
decline is not just a setback for health systems but a reversal of social
progress. Ensuring its continuity is therefore both a moral and developmental
imperative.
Dr. Uzodinma Adirieje is an environmental health researcher with
Afrihealth Optonet Association (AHOA), focused on linking ecosystem health and
human well-being in Nigeria. He is a global health practitioner, development expert,
and civil society leader whose work sits at the critical nexus of biodiversity,
health, and climate change. He serves as the Chief Executive Officer of AHOA, a
pan-African civil society network advancing sustainable development through
advocacy, policy dialogue, and grassroots interventions. With over two decades
of experience, Dr. Adirieje has championed the understanding that biodiversity
is essential for human health - supporting food security, disease regulation,
clean water, and resilient livelihoods. His leadership promotes integrated
approaches that address environmental degradation, climate change, and poverty
simultaneously. Through AHOA, he leads multi-country initiatives on climate
change, ecosystem restoration, renewable energy, universal health coverage, and
climate-smart agriculture, while advocating for stronger governance and
inclusive community participation. At national, regional, and global levels,
Dr. Adirieje engages with governments, international organizations, and civil
society to drive policies linking health and environment. His work underscores
that safeguarding biodiversity is not only an ecological necessity but also a
cornerstone of global health and sustainable development in Africa and the
Global South.
No comments:
Post a Comment