PROMOTING DEMOCRACY IN AFRICA WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE UNITED STATES INTERVENTION AGAINST PRESIDENT MADURO IN VENEZUELA
Global Health and
Development Projects
Consultant | Conferences Organizer | Trainer| Facilitator |
Researcher | M&E Expert | Civil Society
Leader | Policy Advocate
📞 🟢 +234 803 472 5905 | ✉️
afrepton@gmail.com| 🌐 https://www.afrihealthcsos.org
The
United States’ recent interventionist posture toward Venezuela under President
Nicolás Maduro has captured global attention, raising fundamental questions
about sovereignty, self-determination, and the international community’s role
in advancing democratic norms. While the situation in Venezuela is distinct and
context-specific, it serves as a prism through which African nations and civil
society can reflect on the promotion of democracy on our own continent.
At the
heart of any intervention — whether diplomatic, economic, or, in extreme
scenarios, military — should be a genuine commitment to democratic renewal and
the protection of basic human rights for all
citizens and inhabitants of every country. The crisis in
Venezuela, defined by contested elections, economic collapse, mass
displacement, and severe humanitarian distress, does indeed call for robust
international engagement. However, the manner in which external powers — the
United States included — engage must adhere strictly to the principles of
international law and respect for the will of the people.
Africa’s
democratic evolution has been uneven. While progress has been made in countries
such as Ghana, Senegal, and Botswana, other nations continue to struggle with
authoritarian relapse, corrupt
leadership, weak
institutions, and compromised electoral integrity. Too often, foreign
interventions — justified on the basis of promoting democracy — have
exacerbated internal divisions, empowered illegitimate actors, or left behind
fractured societies. Therefore, African stakeholders must critically examine
the Venezuelan case, not to emulate foreign models blindly, but to distil
lessons on how democracy should genuinely be cultivated.
Promoting democracy in Africa must be
African-led. External actors can support civil society, urge adherence to
constitutional norms, and encourage transparent governance, but the impetus for
democratic change must come from within. This local ownership is essential to
legitimacy and sustainability. In the Venezuelan context, many Venezuelans have
called for dialogue, institutional reforms, and negotiated solutions. Likewise,
Africans must prioritize inclusive political processes and dialogue, ensuring
that all voices — including youth, women, and marginalized communities — are
meaningfully represented.
The international community, including the
United States, should deploy consistent, principled engagement rather than
selective pressure driven by strategic interests. Democracy is not a commodity
to be wielded when convenient; it is a universal value that requires steadfast
commitment. When U.S. foreign policy frames intervention in Venezuela, it must
be transparent in its objectives, calibrated to avoid harm to civilians, and
supportive of humanitarian relief. This same principle applies to Africa —
engagement should reinforce local efforts, bolster institutions like
independent judiciaries and electoral commissions, and align with African Union
frameworks for conflict prevention and democratic governance.
The
Venezuelan situation underscores the importance of economic foundations for
democracy. Political rights cannot flourish in a vacuum of economic despair. In
Africa, economic justice and democratic empowerment must be regarded as inseparable. We must champion policies
that reduce inequality, expand access to quality healthcare and education, and
create opportunities for our citizens — particularly young people — to
meaningfully participate in political life. External partners can assist by
investing in sustainable development, since
imposing economic sanctions inadvertently harm vulnerable populations.
Ultimately,
true promotion of democracy is less about intervention and more about
solidarity with peoples’ aspirations for freedom, equality, dignity, and accountable governance. Africa’s
democratic journey will be stronger if informed by principles of respect,
partnership, and genuine engagement — lessons we can extract from observing
global dynamics such as the United States’ posture toward Venezuela. Democracy
must be nurtured with patience, humility, unwavering commitment to human rights, and devoid of nepotism — first and
foremost by Africans themselves.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Dr. Uzodinma Adirieje is a Nigerian development
expert, health economist, evaluator, and civil society leader deeply committed
to advancing democracy and good governance across Nigeria and Africa. As CEO
and Programmes Director of Afrihealth Optonet Association (AHOA) and President
of the Society for Conservation and Sustainability of Energy and Environment in
Nigeria (SOCSEEN), he integrates principles of accountability, transparency,
and citizen participation into policy and program design. Through advocacy,
research, and strategic partnerships, Dr. Adirieje champions democratic values
that empower marginalized communities, foster inclusive decision-making, and
strengthen public institutions. His leadership in the African Network of Civil
Society Organizations (ANCSO) and the Civil Society Partnership for Sustainable
Development Goals (CSP4SDGs) reflects his dedication to building robust civic
spaces where diverse voices influence governance processes. He emphasizes
evidence-based engagement with government stakeholders to enhance policy
effectiveness and public trust. Dr. Adirieje’s work in monitoring and
evaluation equips civil society with tools to hold leaders accountable and
measure governmental performance against democratic and good governance
benchmarks. A Certified Management Consultant and Health Economist, he also
contributes to national policy frameworks, advocating for systems that uphold
rule of law, transparency, and equitable service delivery. His career
exemplifies a sustained commitment to democratic deepening and responsive
governance.
